Ikpeazu v Ogar: Re-Examining The Meaning Of ‘Beyond Reasonable Doubt’
![Image](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-m6O2vfZSqFg/V7mNN3WDxdI/AAAAAAAAEYU/2yv3grmLxl4lYSct8oBmK9rXqOK6KsU8ACLcB/s1600/Ikpeazu-Ogah.png)
In law, the onus is on the Plaintiff/Prosecutor to prove his allegation. In other words, it is the duty of the Plaintiff to prove his case against a Defendant. And he must prove his case beyond reasonable doubt. Hence, the defendant can exercise his right to remain silent through to the end of the case.